Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Early Childhood

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Maternal/Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Maternal/Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Children with Health Insurance

96.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 96.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) (96.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.2%).
Prior Value
(96.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Social Environment and Family Structure

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Social Environment and Family Structure

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Children in Single-Parent Households

30.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 30.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Nutrition

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Nutrition

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Child Food Insecurity Rate

14.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.2%), Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Socioeconomic Stability

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA)

Socioeconomic Stability

Value
Compared to:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

16.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 16.6% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 16.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Children Living Below 100% Poverty Level

Current Value:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Children Living Below 100% Poverty Level

15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:

Region: Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

52.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 52.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) has a value of 52.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Greater Hampton Roads (MSA) value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)